According to the American Cancer Society, use of a tanning bed before age 35 increases your risk of developing melanoma by 75 percent…. 75 percent!

We protect — or attempt to protect — our young from the dangers of smoking, drinking alcohol, and driving before they are fully prepared. Laws exist in these areas because it is the general consensus that these behaviors are dangerous and that minors do not have the capacity to make such decisions for themselves. Whether or not they 500874_sunbedhave responsible parents is not at issue.

The question is this: Is it plain common sense… or is it simply too much government interference to impose stricter regulations on tanning salons — at least where minors are concerned.

Read this post in its entirety and answer the poll:

Ban on Tanning Beds: Common Sense or Government Interference?

2 Responses to “Ban on Tanning Beds: Common Sense or Government Interference?”

  1. krystal Says:

    Tanning beds should absolutely be banned for minors. A parent’s consent makes no sense. The law should protect minors even if parents don’t. The melanoma risk increases exponentially the younger the tanner. Tanning bed rays penetrate deeply and damage DNA. Too many beautiful young people are getting melanoma. This is the one cancer that can and should be prevented.

  2. Diane J Standiford Says:

    I just hate tanning beds. Hate the whole idea. Vanity. Duck lipped Botox wannabees. But I’ll let those who use them decide. Guns, drugs, cigs, booze, people and kids will get it if they want it bad enough—stop the want.

Leave a Reply

Comment spam protected by SpamBam



Site Navigation